Posts tagged with nerd.

My 12-step program to getting published ... or not

 

And now back to the effects of flooding on the pecan weevil.

Last week, the patented Nerd Girl Scientific Progress Flow Chart helped us follow the life cycle of a hypothesis. There were growth spurts, extended periods of indolence, and occasional forays into beer and moral turpitude.

This week, follow along with the patented Nerd Girl Scientific Publication Flowchart, wherein we determine whether our hypothesis gets a haircut and a job and moves out of its parents’ basement, or whether it’s doomed to rejection, scorn, and sitting around shotgunning Labatts and talking about how great things used to be.

0. Celebrate completion of manuscript describing hypothesis with game of Spider Solitaire.
0.1 Go to step 1.

1. Send manuscript to co-authors asking for their input.
1.1 Nobody replies to your e-mail. Think to yourself, “this is just like when I throw a party”. Cry a bit, then go to step 2.
1.2 Receive a smattering of half-hearted responses. Go to step 2.
1.3 Everyone responds with input. Go to step 3.

2. Send “gentle reminder” to those who haven’t replied. Congratulate self on ability to hide seething hatred of co-authors’ inertia in carefully-worded e-mail.
2.1 Yet again, nobody responds. Give up and go to step 4.
2.2 More half-hearted responses. Go to step 4.

3. Ha! Trick question. This never happens. Go back to step 2, dreamer. And take your rainbows, unicorns and dream of a perfect world with you.

4. Weight co-authors’ input, determine whether it is worthy of inclusion in the manuscript.
4.1 No. Go to step 5.
4.2 Grudgingly adjust a few sentences and go to step 5.

5. Send manuscript to supervisor for review. Go to step 6.

6. Wait. Go to step 7.

7. Continue waiting. Return to step 6 and get caught in horrible infinite loop of waiting. Eventually break out of the cycle by exploiting a rip in space-time, or just knocking on your supervisor’s door and guilt-tripping them into reading your paper. Go to step 8.

8. Begin arduous process of submitting the paper to a respectable journal. The exact format for submission varies from journal to journal, however the one aspect of the process universal to all journals is that it is bloody stupid.
8.1 Put on protective helmet so as to not damage yourself during the inevitable banging-head-on-desk that is soon to happen. Go to step 8.2.
8.2 Try 28 possible username/password combinations in attempt to remember your journal submission system login details. Eventually give up and create new account. Go to step 8.3.
8.3 Split your carefully constructed manuscript up into whatever arbitrary chunks the journal insists upon (“Abstract”, “Introduction”, “Middle bit”, “Part that only makes sense to 4 people on this planet, none of whom will be reviewing this”), uploading an individual file for each section. 18 files later, go to step 8.4.
8.4 Spend a further day uploading each individual figure and figure legend. Go to step 8.5.
8.5 Complete the submission by crafting a suitably gushing cover letter praising the journal and its fine editorial board whilst grovelling for inclusion in their upcoming issue. Hit “Submit” and go to step 9.

9. Wait for a response.
9.1 No news is good news. This means the journal has sent your article out to reviewers with some expertise on the effects of flooding on the pecan weevil. Pray that Nickels isn’t one of them, and go to step 10.
9.2 Should the journal decide that wet pecan weevils are not of interest to their readership, they will e-mail you within a few weeks with the editorial equivalent of the breakup – “it’s just not a good fit for our readership”. Pursue typical post-breakup strategy of deciding to aim lower next time. Skip Nature or Science in favour of resubmitting to someone less likely to reject you, like Scandinavian Transactions on Hyperhydrated Weevils. Return to step 9.

10. Some months later, you receive the reviewer’s reports.
10.1 Reviewer 1 was clearly too busy with Spider Solitaire to submit anything more than the most cursory of reviews. Agree to their inconsequential suggestions (“I really don’t like the use of orange in Figure 6A”) and move on to step 11.
10.2 Reviewer 2 will only accept your paper provided you jump through a series of experimental hoops in an attempt to satisfying their nagging curiosity regarding a point that nobody else on the planet cares about. Bribe a grad student with beer again to carry out said experiments; begin crafting small Reviewer 2 voodoo doll. When experiments are complete and paper is modified, continue to step 11.
10.3 Reviewer 3, who is probably Nickels, hated your paper and is ruing the fact that the electronic review system does not allow them to send a flaming bag of dog poop over the internet in lieu of an actual written report. Hope that the journal editor figures 2/3 is good enough and move to step 11.

11. After having made the adjustments requested by the reviewers, put your helmet back on and resubmit the revised version of your manuscript using the same arduous process as in step 8. Go to step 12.

12. Hope that your adjustments were sufficient to ensure acceptance of the manuscript.
12.1 Rejection! Consider leaving weevil biology.
12.2 Success! You’ll be in Scandinavian Transactions on Hyperhydrated Weevils in only 8 months’ time! Realize the insignificance of the achievement and consider leaving weevil biology anyway.

Tagged with 2008, Blog, nerd | Comments (28) |

Free to be you and geek

 

Welcome to university, Young Nerd. This is your time to shine.

 

Your decision to attend one of this country's venerable Institutes of Higher Learning and Occasional Consumption of Grain-Derived Ethanol Products wasn't merely the choice to further your education and improve your career prospects.

 

No, Young Nerd - by choosing to attend university, you have elected to spend the next four to n years (where n is any non-negative real number) in the company of fellow nerds, where you are free to be your geeky self. You have found your people. You have joined the pack. You are Nerd, and you are Strong.

 

I am Nerd, too. I will be your dorky and slightly clumsy guide to all things Nerd on this website, a position for which I am eminently qualified.

 

I hold 2.5 degrees, the geekiest of which is a PhD in the field of bioinformatics, which, on the Venn diagram of scientific disciplines, represents the union of biology and computer science. I have published on topics ranging from the immunomodulatory effects of commensal bacteria on the host immune system to kernel methods for the separation of non-linearly-separable vector-based data. I have five computers running three different operating systems, have been spun around in a human centrifuge, know my genotype at my caffeine response locus, and my favourite joke involves a speeding physicist and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

 

Yup. I'm a nerd. And I've been one ever since I popped out of the womb, graphing calculator in hand.

 

While the Nerd Baby years generally pass uneventfully, it is a sad and universal truth that as childhood progresses, the Young Nerd is generally ostracized by its peers. We spend our youths sitting alone at the front of the school bus, crying tiny nerd tears as we weather a continuous rain of spitballs issued forth by the cool kids sitting behind us.  We eat our lunch alone, save for the brief moments of companionship afforded by a cool kid pausing to rummage through our lunch bags on a cookie-stealing mission. We play alone on the playground, spending countless hours absorbed in that loneliest of games, Solo Tetherball.

 

University, however, changes all of that. Here, you are among equals. Look over there! It's the kid that was too clumsy to tie his shoelaces until 8th grade but could name every dinosaur ever by the end of kindergarten!  Hey - there's the misunderstood drama geek! And wait! You're surrounded by hordes of other nerds who still haven't been kissed! Yes, Young Nerd, you have found your spiritual home.

 

When the high school guidance counsellor sat you down for a chat after they released you from a locker-stuffing and told that one day it'd be okay; that one day you'd rise above your peers and fears to spread your wings and fly? Well, despite the fact that they were most likely just parroting some nuggets off a faded motivational poster on their wall, they were actually right.

 

I have spent the last 12 years of my life on university campuses across Canada, and not once have I heard of any incident bearing even the most passing of resemblances to the nightmares we nerds faced daily as children.

 

There have been no recorded incidents of cliques of Anthropology majors lurking in the recesses of the library, waiting to slam a copy of Franz Boas' "The Mind of Primitive Man" into the bespectacled face of a passing student. No reports of roving packs of Philosophers exploring the concepts of The Other and The Absurd through random de-pantsings. No tales of English majors scrawling bathroom graffiti exquisitely detailing your sexual inexperience in iambic pentameter. 

 

No, the university campus is generally free from the mind games and psychological torture so characteristic of high school. I attribute this to the fact that the small-mindedness that impels our childhood tormentors towards a youth spent honing their Swirlie and Wedgie skills is mutually exclusive vis à vis the desire to better oneself through the acquisition of worldly knowledge.

 

This hypothesis is borne out by research I undertook into the current pursuits of some of my own childhood tormentors. One girl enjoyed nothing more than snatching whatever Choose Your Own Adventure I was absorbed in at the time out of my hands and flinging it into the farthest possible puddle/corner/wasp-riddled shrub. A quick Google search reveals that she now appears to belong to a local Charismatic Christian sect, one of those that believes in things like prophecy and frequently mistakes a woman's uterus for a clown car.

 

Another young "lady" would frequently sit behind me on the school bus and noogie me with such ferocity that a veritable snow globe of dandruff would be created, a phenomenon to which she would then loudly draw everyone's attention. My investigation reveals that while she now appears to be a functioning member of society, she has a penchant for posing for photos whilst clutching a rifle and standing on front of big game.

I have yet to track down her partner in crime, however - a girl who I remember as being the size of a moose, with a bellow to match. I can only imagine that she is somehow associated with a women's prison, though whether it is in the capacity of inmate or matron I know not.

 

It was only when university began and I left my tormentors behind that I was at last able to trade my fears of ridicule and embarrassment at the hands of my peers for more pedestrian worries, like whether my lab safety goggles were going to leave a permanent red mark on my face. I was finally in a place where I could wear my geekdom like a badge, and indeed my four years as undergrad saw me rise to a position of campus-wide Nerdfame, along with my merry band of fellow dorks.

 

As Nerd Girl, I shall endeavour to bring you tales from campus nerd-dom past and present. This column will explore the social and mating behaviours of the campus nerd, tell stories of great nerds of history, and share stories from the sublime to the ridiculous. This is your story, Nerds!

 

Tagged with nerd, geek | Comments (44) |